A commentary on insurance coverage issues in Hawaii and beyond
Although the insured recovered from her insurer for property damage caused by Hurricane Katrina, her claim for loss of personal property was denied because it was not timely submitted. See Williams v. Louisiana Citizens Fair Plan, 2012 La. App. LEXIS 599 (May 2, 2012).
After the hurricane struck, Louisiana Citizens paid the…
As noted in today's Christian Science Monitor [here], the insurance implications for losses caused by Hurricane Irene will be tempered by at least two factors. First, much of the damage was caused by flood, a peril not covered under a home owner's or commercial property policy. Only if the insured has additional…
The insurers' resistance to discovery requests was before the court in Cummins, Inc. v. Ace Am. Ins. Co., et al., 2011 U.S.Dist. LEXIS 46984 (D. Ind. May 2, 2011).
The factual background involved coverage Cummins sought for severe flood damage at its main corporate campus. The insurers had paid over $91 million…
When the insureds purchased their home along the Mississippi Gulf coast, they discussed obtaining property insurance with Richard Schmidt, a Nationwide insurance salesman employed by Felsher Insurance Agency. See Mladineo v. Schmidt, 2010 Miss. LEXIS 569 (Miss. Oct. 28, 2010). The insureds' complaint alleged they told Schmidt they desired a policy with full…
Whether damage caused by rainwater escaping from a drainage system was excluded as "surface water" or flood was the issue before the court in M and M Corp v. Auto-Owners Ins. Co., 2010 S.C. LEXIS 326 (S.C. Oct. 11, 2010).
The insured owned a hotel located along a street that was being improved by…
A prior post [here] discussed the Fifth Circuit's grappling with the proper measurement for covering loss of a home due to Hurricane Katrina. On rehearing, the Fifth Circuit altered its prior determination that the policy's loss provision was ambiguous. See Bradley v. Allstate Ins. Co., 2010 U.S. App. LEXIS 19476 (5th Cir. Sept.
The American Samoa Power Authority (ASPA) recently filed suit against Lloyd’s and HCC International Insurance Company for failure to provide coverage for property loss caused by the earthquakes and tsunamis that struck the area in September 2009. See Am. Samoa Power Authority v. Certain Underwriters at Lloyd’s London, et al., Civil No. 10-00546 ACK-KSC…
After flood coverage was denied, the insured sued under state law theories. See Worthen v. Galveston Ins. Associates, 2010 U.S. Dist. LEXIS 94925 (S.D. Tex. Sept. 13, 2010). The district court dismissed the state law claims on preemption grounds.
The insured purchased a flood policy on August 10, 2007 for his home…
When both a covered risk and a non-covered risk cause some of the property damage, which party bears the burden of identifying the discrete items of property that were damaged and proving what portion of the damage was caused by a non-covered or excluded risk? See Bayle v. Allstate Ins. Co., 2010 U.S.
The Fifth Circuit considered whether the district court properly determined that an excess policy covered flood, but that coverage was limited under the policy's anti-concurrent causation clause (post on district court's prior decision here). The appellate court reversed in part and remanded. Stewart Enter., Inc. v. RSUI Indem. Co., Inc., 2010 U.S. App. LEXIS 16555(5th…
