The insurer's argument that a contractual indemnity provision in favor of the insured acted as an "other insurance" provision failed before the Fifth Circuit. Cameron Int'l Corp. v. Liberty Ins. Underwriters, Inc., 2015 U.S. App. LEXIS 20115 (5th Cir. Nov. 19, 2015).

   In an insurance dispute arising out of the Deepwater Horizon

   One insurer could not escape equitable subrogation on the basis of its "other insurance" provision on the theory that the second insurer was responsible for all of the co-insured's defense costs. Underwriters of Interest v. ProBuilders Spec. Ins. Co., 2015 Cal. Ct. App. LEXIS 936 (Cal. Ct. App. Oct. 23, 2015).

   Underwriters issued

   The court determined that the other insurance and loss payment provisions relieved the insurer of coverage obligations. Moroney Body Works, Inc. v. Central Ins. Co., 2015 Mass. App. LEXIS 97 (Aug. 6, 2015).

   A fire destroyed Moroney's custom-built bookmobile that had just been completed. Moroney had two policies: a commercial property policy

   In a well-reasoned, wide-ranging opinion by Justice Acoba in response to four certified questions from the Ninth Circuit, the Hawaii Supreme Court addressed various issues raised by competing "other insurance" provisions in two CGL policies. Nautilus Ins. Co. v. Lexington Ins. Co., 132 Haw. 283, 321 P.3d 634 (2014). 

   Coverage for a development

    In a battle between two insurers, one insurer's reliance upon its policy's escape provision did not excuse its failure to contribute to the insured's defense and an eventual settlement. See W. World Ins. Co. v. Markel Am Ins. Co., 2012 U.S. App. LEXIS 9335.

   The underlying plaintiff was injured when he fell down an elevator

    Wright-Ryan was hired as the general contractor to construct a building at the University of Southern Maine.  Wright-Ryan Constr., Inc. v. AIG Ins. Co. of Canada, 2011 U.S. App. LEXIS 15502 (1st Cir. July 27, 2010).  Wright-Ryan subcontracted with Norgate Metal, Inc. for the fabrication and erection of structural steel for the project.  Norgate

   A policy's "other insurance" clause and a contractual indemnity provision were at the root for determining which of two insurers had to cover for injuries at a construction site. Valley Forge Ins. Co. v. Zurich Am. Ins. Co., 2011 U.S.Dist. LEXIS 76061 (N.D. Calif. July 14, 2011).

   Hathaway was the general contractor at a demolition

   The New York Court of Appeals considered the impact of competing “other insurance” provisions located in both a CGL policy and a D&O policy.  See Fieldston Property Owners Assoc., Inc. v. Hermitage Ins. Co., Inv., 2011 N.Y. LEXIS 254 (N.Y. Feb. 24, 2011).

   In the underlying case, Fieldston’s officers were charged with making false

    If the insured's two carriers both have "other insurance" provisions, which policy is primary and which is excess.  The federal district court sorted through this issue in Nautilus Ins. Co. v. Lexington Ins. Co., 2010 U.S. Dist. LEXIS 120883 (D. Haw. Nov. 15, 2010).

    In July 2007, Kila Kila Builders, a subcontractor, and VP&PK

   The court considered the validity of a contractual provision to provide insurance when the indemnity clause was deemed invalid.  See Travelers Lloyds Ins. Co. v. Pacific Employers Ins. Co., 2010 U.S. App. LEXIS 7113 (5th Cir. April 6, 2010).

   The landlord, The Centre, leased commercial property to the tenant, Best Buy Stores, Inc.  Pursuant to the