A commentary on insurance coverage issues in Hawaii and beyond
The Maine Supreme Court found a homeowner's policy did not cover damages for loss of investment, undisclosed physical problems with the property, and emotional distress. Langevin v. Allstate Ins. Co., 2013 LEXIS Me 54 (Me. June 4, 2013).
The underlying plaintiffs sued the insured after purchasing his home for $315,000. The insured…
The court rejected the insured's argument that there was coverage for the collapse of a building caused by water leakage (a covered peril) and landslide (an uncovered peril). Stor/Gard, Inc. v. Strathmore Ins. Co., 2013 U.S. LEXIS App. 11015 (1st Cir. May 31, 2013).
A severe rain storm caused soil to slide…
The Hawaii Supreme Court found that an insurer assigned a claim under the Hawaii Insurance Joint Underwriting Program (JUP) owed a duty of good faith and fair dealing to the insured. Willis v. Swain, 2013 Haw. LEXIS 210 (June 7, 2013). We previously posted on the Intermediate Court of Appeals decision [here…
Despite its application stating otherwise, the insured's failure to install a sprinkler system in its building barred coverage for extensive damage caused by fire. American Way Cellular, Inc. v. Travelers Prop. Cas. Co. of Am., 2013 Cal. App. LEXIS 425 (Cal. Ct. App. May 30, 2013).
American Way contacted a broker, A&J…
The U.S. District Court in Alabama certified a question to the Connecticut Supreme Court: Is damage to a project caused by faulty workmanship "property damage" resulting from an "occurrence"? With some qualification, the Connecticut Supreme Court answered in the affirmative. Capstone Building Corp. v. Am. Motorists Ins. Co., SC 18886 (Conn. June 11, 2013).…
The Fifth Circuit affirmed the district court's holding that the pollution liability insurer owed a duty to defend a generating plant sued by the EPA. Louisiana Generating L.L.C. v. Illinois Union Ins. Co., 2013 U.S. App. LEXIS 9837 (5th Cir. May 15, 2013).
Louisiana Generating ("LaGen") was sued by the EPA for…
The federal district court assumed there was "property damage" caused by an "occurrence," but found the business risk exclusions barred coverage for construction defect claims. Hubbell v. Carney Bros. Constr., 2013 U.S. Dist. LEXIS 68331 (D. Colo. May 13, 2013).
The plaintiffs entered a construction contract with the insured general contractor to build…
The Montana Supreme Court found coverage in a wrongful death case brought against an educational academy and others. Newman v. Scottsdale Ins. Co.,2013 Mont. LEXIS 146 (Mont. May 7, 2013).
The 16-year old girl was residing at the Spring Creek Lodge Academy in Montana at the time of her death. The girl's…
The Alabama Supreme Court found there was no coverage for the insured cabinet maker for claims arising from alleged faulty workmanship. Shane Traylor Cabinetmaker, L.L.C. v. Am. Resources Ins. Co., Inc., 2013 Ala. LEXIS 42 (May 3, 2013).
The insured was sued by a homeowner for property damage caused by faulty workmanship.
A prior post here discussed the Tenth Circuit's decision in Greystone Constr., Inc. v. National Union Fire & Marine Ins. Co., 661 F. 3d 1272 (10th Cir. 2011). The court found a duty to defend construction defect claims where damage caused by the faulty workmanship was unintentional. The Tenth Circuit remanded for a…
