A commentary on insurance coverage issues in Hawaii and beyond
The federal district court found that the insurer acted in bad faith when the claim was denied based on the adjuster's lack of knowledge of recent case law in Washington. Sec. Nat'l Ins. Co. v. Constr. Assocs. of Spokane, 2022 U.S. Dist. LEXIS 53533 (E.D. Wash. March 24, 2022).
Construction…
The Ninth Circuit, relying upon the Washington Supreme Court's response to a certified question (prior post here] found that the insurer was bound by the agent's certificate of insurance identifying an additional insured. T-Mobile USA Inc. v. Selective Ins. Co of Am., 787 Fed. Appx. 395 (9th Cir. Dec. 9, 2019). …
Answering a certified question from the Ninth Circuit, the Washington Supreme Court responded that an insurer's agent who makes a representation in a certificate of insurance binds the insurer. T-Mobile USA Inc. v. Selective Ins. Co. of Am., 2019 Wash. LEXIS 659 (Wash. Sup. Ct. Oct. 10, 2019).
Two T-Mobile…
The Ninth Circuit certified a question to the Washington Supreme Court as follows:
Under Washington law, is an insurer bound by representations made by its authorized agent in a certificate of insurance with respect to a party's status as an additional insured under a policy issued by the insurer, when the certificate includes language disclaiming
…
