A commentary on insurance coverage issues in Hawaii and beyond
The court denied cross-motions from the insured and the insurer after the insured’s dwelling suffered a collapse of the ceiling. Simons v. Fed. Ins. Co., 2025 U.S. Dist. LEXIS 75839 (C.D. Calif. March 4, 2025).
Gary Simons bought a second home located in Park City, Utah (“Utah Property”) that was…
The Court of Appeals for the D.C. Circuit reversed the district court's finding of no coverage and found that the ensuing loss provision provided coverage for water damage. 3524 East Cap Venture, LLC, et al. v. Weschester Fire Ins. Co., et al., 104 F. 4th 193 (D.C. Cir. 2024).
Plaintiff…
In an unusual move for a federal district court handling COVID-19 claims, a certified question was submitted to the Maryland Court of Appeals for an interpretation of state law. Tapestry, Inc. v. Factor Mut. Ins. Co., 2022 U.S. Dist. LEXIS 75665 (D. Md. April 25, 2022).
Tapestry owned three luxury…
The South Carolina Supreme Court held that a post-loss assignment of rights under the policy was valid even though consent of the insurer was not requested. PCS Nitrogen, Inc. v. Cont'l Cas. Co., 2022 S.C. LEIXS 54 (S.C. April 13, 2022).
In 1966, Columbia Nitrogen Corporation (Old CNC) began operating…
The policy's requirement that collapse constitute an abrupt falling down of the building barred coverage for the homeowner. Marigliani v. Citizens Ins. Co. of Am., 2019 Conn. Super. LEXIS 137 (Conn Super. Ct. Feb. 1, 2019).
The plaintiffs' hoe was built in 1985 and they purchased it in 2001. A…
