October 2010

   The Indiana Supreme Court has now weighed in on liability coverage for construction defects and has decided faulty workmanship with unforeseen consequences is an occurrence.  See Sheehan Construc. Co. Inc. v. Continental Cas. Co., 2010 Ind. LEXIS 557 (Ind. Sept. 30, 2010). 

   Sheehan was the general contractor for construction of homes in a residential subdivision

   Today's post departs slightly from insurance coverage matters, but is related to a prior post discussing the pursuit of intentional torts against insurers administering claims under the Longshore Harbor and Workers Compensation Act ("LHWCA").  The prior post described an article authored by my blogging colleague, Mark Murakami (hawaiioceanlaw.com), and me, noting that an exclusive remedy

   A prior post [here]  discussed the Fifth Circuit's grappling with the proper measurement for covering loss of a home due to Hurricane Katrina.  On rehearing, the Fifth Circuit altered its prior determination that the policy's loss provision was ambiguous.  See Bradley v. Allstate Ins. Co., 2010 U.S. App. LEXIS 19476 (5th Cir. Sept.

   The American Samoa Power Authority (ASPA) recently filed suit against Lloyd’s and HCC International Insurance Company for failure to provide coverage for property loss caused by the earthquakes and tsunamis that struck the area in September 2009.  See Am. Samoa Power Authority v. Certain Underwriters at Lloyd’s London, et al., Civil No. 10-00546 ACK-KSC