A commentary on insurance coverage issues in Hawaii and beyond
Addressing an issue not yet decided in Kentucky, the Sixth Circuit predicted Kentucky courts would grant the insurer's right to seek reimbursement for settlement costs paid in the underlying litigation. See Travelers Property Cas. Co. of Am. v. Hillerich & Bradsby Co., Inc., 2010 U.S. App. LEXIS 5288 (6th Cir. March 12, 2010).
…
In Kaufmann v. The Travelers Companies, Inc., 2010 U.S. Dist. LEXIS 20027 (D. Md. March 5, 2010), the insureds sold their restaurant to plaintiffs. The insureds represented that the restaurant and bar seated 400 patrons. The plaintiffs made known to the insureds they intended to create a patio that would utilize the 400…
Plaintiff's home was damaged by Hurricane Katrina on August 29, 2005. See Bridges v. EMC Mortgage Corp., 2010 U.S. Dist. LEXIS 18433 (S.D. Miss. March 2, 2010). She filed suit against her insurer, Liberty Mutual. In her amended complaint, the plaintiff added her mortgage company, EMC, as a defendant, alleging EMC failed to…
On its third trip to the Hawai`i appellate courts, the decision in Mikelson v. United Services Automobile Assoc., No. 28332 (Haw. Ct. App. March 24, 2010)(opinion here) addressed whether the Circuit Court's confirmation of the arbitration award was appropriate when the insurer had already paid the arbitration award. (Disclosure – our…
The insured, Versai, managed apartments that were so extensively damaged by Hurricane Katrina that they were uninhabitable. See Versai Mg. Corp. v. Clarendon Am Ins. Co., No. 08-30874, 2010 U.S. App. LEXIS 3479 (5th Cir. Feb. 19, 2010). Versai notified its insurers and submitted claims with the assistance of its private adjusters and…
Coverage under a CGL policy for the subcontractor's construction defects was at issue in Architex Assoc., Inc. v. Scottsdale Ins. Co., No. 2008-CA-01353-SCT, 2010 Miss. LEXIS 71 (Miss. Feb. 11, 2010). Although the lower court determined there was no occurrence under the policy, and thus no coverage, the Supreme Court reversed.
Architex…
The additional insured contractor was not entitled to a defense where the underlying case failed to allege any negligence by insured subcontractor. See Clarendon Nat. Ins. Co. v. Am. States Ins. Co., No. 09-548-JO, 2010 U.S. Dist. LEXIS 16091 (D. Ore. Feb. 22, 2010).
Providence built houses and subcontracted with Woodmaster to…
The "your work" exclusion was held inapplicable to damaged portions of a building for which the insured was not responsible. Fortney & Weygandt, Inc. v. Am. Manufacturers Mutual Ins. Co., No 05-4031, 2010 U.S. App. LEXIS 2836 (6th Cir. Feb. 12, 2010).
The insured contracted with Frisch's Restaurants, Inc. to build a Golden Corral…
The ABA’s Section of Litigation, Insurance Coverage Litigation Committee’s annual conference was held in Tucson last week. Rina Carmel and I led a lively discussion on applicable triggers for property policies. Although the manifestation of an injury has been used by some courts to trigger a property policy, the injury-in-fact trigger has more recently been adopted by other courts. The outline for our presentation is here.
If the named insured does not satisfy the self-insured retention (SIR), can the additional insured undertake payment to trigger coverage? Looking at the language of the policies under consideration, the court answered no in Forecast Homes, Inc. v. Steadfast Ins. Co., No. G040876, 2010 Cal. App. LEXIS 172 (Cal. Ct. App. Jan. 12…
