A commentary on insurance coverage issues in Hawaii and beyond
The West VirginiaSupreme Court previously held that construction defects were not covered undera CGL policy. The Court, however, reversed itself in Cherrington v. Erie Ins. Prop. & Cas. Co., 2013 W.Va. LEXIS 724 (W.V.June 18, 2013).
The underlying complaint against the general contractor allegedvarious defects in the plaintiff’s recently constructed house…
Exclusions in the plaintiffs' policy barred coverage for loss caused by heavy rain storms. Emsbo v. Fireman's Fund Ins. Co., 2013 U.S. Dist. LEXIS 86072 (D. R.I. June 19, 2013).
Torrential rain and historic flooding was experienced in Rhode Island in March 2010. The heavy rains over-flowed plaintiffs' rain gutters and flooded…
Plaintiff sued her adjuster in state court after Hurricane Sandy caused flood damage to her home. Plaintiff alleged her insurance company paid her too much money based upon the adjusters' fradulent conduct. After defendants removed the case to federal court, the court granted plaintiff's motion to remand to state court. Brooks v. Foglio…
The Federal District Court in Virginia found that allegations of faulty workmanship could arise from an occurrence. Nautilus Ins. Co. v. Strongwell Corp., 2013 U.S. Dist. LEXIS 79163 (W. D. Va. June 4, 2013).
Strongwell supplied certain fiberglass reinforced plastic materials to a subcontractor of Black & Veatch for a construction…
The Seventh Circuit found that an "Injury to Employees, Contractors, and Employees of Contractors" exclusion was not applicable to bar coverage for injuries to a construction worker. Atlantic Casualty Ins. Co. v. Paszko Masonry, Inc., 2013 U.S. App. LEXIS 11561 (7th Cir. June 7, 2013).
The underlying plaintiff was an employee of a waterproofing…
The Maine Supreme Court found a homeowner's policy did not cover damages for loss of investment, undisclosed physical problems with the property, and emotional distress. Langevin v. Allstate Ins. Co., 2013 LEXIS Me 54 (Me. June 4, 2013).
The underlying plaintiffs sued the insured after purchasing his home for $315,000. The insured…
The court rejected the insured's argument that there was coverage for the collapse of a building caused by water leakage (a covered peril) and landslide (an uncovered peril). Stor/Gard, Inc. v. Strathmore Ins. Co., 2013 U.S. LEXIS App. 11015 (1st Cir. May 31, 2013).
A severe rain storm caused soil to slide…
The Hawaii Supreme Court found that an insurer assigned a claim under the Hawaii Insurance Joint Underwriting Program (JUP) owed a duty of good faith and fair dealing to the insured. Willis v. Swain, 2013 Haw. LEXIS 210 (June 7, 2013). We previously posted on the Intermediate Court of Appeals decision [here…
Despite its application stating otherwise, the insured's failure to install a sprinkler system in its building barred coverage for extensive damage caused by fire. American Way Cellular, Inc. v. Travelers Prop. Cas. Co. of Am., 2013 Cal. App. LEXIS 425 (Cal. Ct. App. May 30, 2013).
American Way contacted a broker, A&J…
The U.S. District Court in Alabama certified a question to the Connecticut Supreme Court: Is damage to a project caused by faulty workmanship "property damage" resulting from an "occurrence"? With some qualification, the Connecticut Supreme Court answered in the affirmative. Capstone Building Corp. v. Am. Motorists Ins. Co., SC 18886 (Conn. June 11, 2013).…
