March 2016

    Thanks to "Coverage Opinions" and Randy Maniloff, Esq. for a write-up on my background as a coverage lawyer and otherwise in the current edition. The piece is here.

    "Coverage Opinions" is a free, monthly electronic newsletter covering recent insurance coverage opinions and other areas of interest to the insurance coverage community. More information here

   An assignment of policy rights made before the policy was issued was ineffective. W. Alliance Bank v. Nat'l Union Fire Ins. Co., 2016 U.S. Dist. LEXIS 19936 (N.D. Cal. Feb. 18, 2016).

   The bank issued a loan to Sorrento Networks, Inc. in 2011. As collateral, Sorrento gave the bank a continuing security

   The magistrate's recommended decision found that damage to plaintiffs' home caused by boats that became loose during Hurricane Sandy was not barred as  "water borne material" under the surface water exclusion. Spindler v. Great N. Ins. Co., 2016 U.S. Dist. LEXIS 16532 (E.D. N. Y. Feb. 2, 2016).

   Plaintiffs' home abutted the

   The court denied the insurer's and the contractor's cross motions for summary judgment. Core Construction Servs. Southeast v. Crum & Forster Specialty Ins. Co., 2016 U.S. Dist. LEXIS 11487 (M.D. Fla. Feb. 1, 2016). 

   Core Construction was the general contractor for the Artisan Club Condominium Community project. Core Construction hired a subcontractor

   The Fifth Circuit found that two storms causing damage to a drilling rig constituted two occurrences, mandating payment of two deductibles. Seahawk Liquidating Trust v. Certain Underwriters at Lloyds London, 2016 U.S. App. LEXIS 871 (5th Cir. Jan 19,2016).

   Seahawk's rig was three-legged, and rose from the seabed by jacking up of 375 foot-legs.

From our presentation this morning at ABA’s Insurance Coverage Litigation Committee’s annual meeting in Tucson. Our panel addressed withdrawal of the duty to defend. My co- presenters were Rina Carmel, Demetrius Rush, and Karin Aldama.

Sent from my iPhone
IMG_1842.JPG

   The district court determined there was a duty to defend based upon allegations that the insured's pillows and mattresses emitted an odor causing bodily injury and property damage to the underlying plaintiffs. Hartford Fire Ins. Co. v. Tempur-Sealy Int'l, Inc., 2016 U.S.Dist. LEXIS 6706 (N.D. Cal. Jan. 20, 2016).

   The insured faced a