The extent of coverage for a General Contractor as an additional insured was the issue in Kummer Enter., Inc. v. Valley Forge Ins. Co., 2011 U.S.Dist. LEXIS 17726 (W.D. Mich. Feb. 23, 2011).
The General Contractor contracted to build an addition to a medical center. One subcontractor, Total Foundations LLC., was required to
The ABA’s Section of Litigation, Insurance Coverage Litigation Committee’s annual conference was held in Tucson on March 3-5, 2011. My colleagues, Rina Carmel, Esq., of Carlson, Calladine & Peterson LLP, and Lisa M. Shusto, P.E., of Exponent Failure Analysis Associates, and I led two lively and engaging discussions on ensuing loss provisions in property
The California Supreme Court considered whether coverage could be denied to innocent insureds whose home was damaged when their son, a co-insured, intentionally set fire to the home. See Century-National Insurance Co. v. Garcia, 2011 Cal LEXIS 1392 (Cal. Feb. 17, 2011).
After the insureds, husband and wife, suffered substantial damage to
Is the insured entitled to coverage if it substantially complies with a policy's pilot warranty requiring completion of ground and flight courses? The Ninth Circuit, applying California law, answered no in Trishan Air, Inc. v. Federal Ins. Co., 2011 U.S. App. LEXIS 3003 (9th Cir. Feb. 16, 2011).
Trishan Air, Inc. purchased an
The claimant's request to modify her permanent partial disability award under the Longshore Harbor and Worker's Compensation Act (LHWCA) was ruled untimely since she waited several years after her initial compensation award. See Wheeler v. Newprot News Shipbuilding and Dry Dock Co., 2011 U.S. App. LEXIS 2889 (4th Cir. Feb. 15, 2011).
Whether coverage existed for property damage occurring after the subcontract finished its work on the project was the issue presented in United Fire & Cas. Co. v. Boulder Plaza Residential, LLC, 2011 U.S. App. LEXIS 1694 (Jan. 27, 2011).
Boulder Plaza Residential, LLC ("BPR"), a real estate developer, and McCrery & Roberts Construction
In October, we reported here that the Intermediate Court of Appeals affirmed the cancellation of a policy based on the insured's misrepresentation of the type of vehicle being insured. The Hawaii Supreme Court recently affirmed the ICA's decision. See Farmer v. Pacific Speciality Ins. Co., 2011 Haw. LEXIS 28 (Haw. Feb. 7, 2011).
Farmer
Today, we link to a guest post from DoorFly.com addressing the need for title insurance. The link to the full post is http://blog.doorfly.com/articles/2011/what-is-title-insurance-and-why-do-we-need-it/. [post here].
By way of introduction, the post explains:
If you’ve ever bought a home or a piece of real estate, you have probably heard the term title insurance
Whether the insurer was obligated to indemnify its insured for potential liability under a contractual indemnity provision was at issue in Farmers Ins. Exchange v. RNK, Inc., 2011 U.S. App. LEXIS 1255 (1st Cir. Jan. 21, 2011).
RNK, a telephone company, and Ripple, a company providing conference services including chat lines, entered
This past Friday, Judge Richard R. Clifton of the U.S. Ninth Circuit Court of Appeals gave an informative and entertaining presentation to the Litigation section of the Hawaii State Bar Association. The title of the presentation was, “Practice Pointers for Appeals: Procedure, Briefing and Oral Argument.”
Judge Clifton started with some personal background.