Photo of Tred R. Eyerly

Tred once again was selected by his peers for inclusion in the 2025 Edition of The Best Lawyers in America® for his work in Commercial Litigation, Insurance Law and Litigation-Insurance. He was also named Best Lawyers® 2022 Litigation Insurance “Lawyer of the Year” in Honolulu. A designation given to a single attorney in each practice group by metropolitan area.

    In a dispute over coverage obligations between two insurers, the court rejected one insurer's claim that the other insurer was equitably estopped from denying a defense. Associated Industries Ins. Co. v. Sentinel Ins. Co., 2025 U.S. Dist. LEXIS 114423 (S.D. N. Y. June 16, 2025). 

    Eduardo Molina was a construction

    The court considered cross-motions for summary judgment to determined which carrier was primary and which was excess for coverage of bodily injury. Travelers Indemn. Co. v. Hudson Excess Ins. Co., 2025 U.S. Dist. LEXIS 110298 (S.D. N. Y. June 10, 2025).

    21 West 86 LLC, the owner of a building

    The court denied the insurer's motion to strike the insureds' expert witnesses, and denied the insurer's motion to dismiss all claims raised under the state's unfair claims settlement act. Gerstman v. Crestbrook Ins. Co., 2025 U.S. Dist. LEXIS 108705 (N.D. Tex. June 9, 2025).

    The insureds' property suffered damage when

    After vandals caused extensive water damage to the insured's building, the claim for resulting loss was rejected by the federal district court. Epperson v. Lexington Ins. Co., 2025 U.S. Dist. LEXIS 102028 (S.D. Ohio May 29, 2025). 

    The insured's borrower defaulted on a loan for purchase of a 78,000 square

    The appellate court reversed the lower court's denial of the insurer's motion to dismiss a claim pursued by non-insured parties. Nino & Nino Corp. v. Utica First Insurance Co., 2025 N.Y. App. Div. LEXIS 3226 (N.Y. App. Div. May 28, 2025). 

    Granville Wiltshire (decedent) was an employee of Door Restaurant

    The lower court's denial of cross-motions for summary judgment concerning the broker's liability for allegedly procuring inadequate coverage was affirmed. Marcellus Energy Servs. LLC v. Tompkins Ins. Agencies, Inc, 2025 N.Y. App. Div. LEXIS 3032 (N.Y. App. Div. May 15, 2025).

    Plaintiff Marcellus Energy Services LLC supplied truck drivers to

    The court denied the insurer's motion to strike the insureds' expert witnesses, and denied the insurer's motion to dismiss claims under the Texas fair claims settlement act. Gerstman v. Crestbrook Ins. Co., 2025 U.S. Dist. LEXIS 108705 (N.D. Tex. Jun 9, 2025). 

    The insureds' property suffered damage when, during a