Are construction defects that allegedly result in water intrusion and property damage over several policy periods the result of one occurrence or multiple occurrences?  This was the issue under consideration in Bayley Constr. v. Am Guar. and Liab. Ins. Co., 2010 U.S. Dist. LEXIS 110767 (W.D. Wash. Oct. 15, 2010).

   Bayley Construction

   An exclusion under a CGL policy for bodily injury arising out of automobile accidents prevented coverage when an employee was at fault.  See Sprinkles v. Assoc. Indemn. Corp., 2010 Cal. App. LEXIS 1532 (Cal. Ct. App. Sept. 1, 2010).

   Bibinz, an employee of Sinco, caused the accident, killing the deceased.  The deceased's family

   An exclusion for claims arising from roofing barred coverage when the underlying plaintiff was injured after falling from a scaffold.  See Penn-America Ins. Co. v. Lavigne, 2010 U.S. App. LEXIS 17675 (1st Cir. Aug. 24, 2010).

   Michael Daigle was hired to put a new roof on an apartment building and to seal some

   Sorting out whether the contractor had coverage for alleged construction defects under the subcontractor's policies was the issue in Travelers Cas. and Sur. Co. v. Dormitory Auth., State of New York, 2010 U.S. Dist. LEXIS 79024 (S.D. N.Y. July 30, 2010).

   Trataros Construction, Inc. was the general contractor on the project.  Trataros contracted

   The insurer defended the underlying construction defect case under a reservation of rights, but moved for summary judgment in the coverage action on its duty to indemnify.  Mid-Continent Caus. Co. v. Frank Casserino Constr., Inc., 2010 U.S. Dist. LEXIS 59363 (M.D. Fla. June 16, 2010). 

   The general contractor subcontracted with the insured to perform building

   In a coverage dispute between two insurers, the court considered the impact of an endorsement excluding coverage for any loss that first manifested before the term of the policy.  See Pa. Gen. Ins. Co. v. Am. Safety Indemn. Co., 2010 Cal. App. LEXIS 981 (Cal. Ct. App. June 28, 2010).

   Whitacre Construction, a

   As we noted in a prior post, the Hawaii Intermediate Court of Appeals recently decided that construction defects do not constitute an occurrence under a CGL policy.  Citing the same Colorado Court of Appeals case that the Hawaii ICA found persuasive, the 10th Circuit certified a similar issue to the Colorado Supreme Court in Greystone

   Marriott entered a franchise agreement with Columbia Hotels.  See Marriott Int'l, Inc. v. Amoco Ins. Co., 2010 U.S. Dist. LEXIS 53253 (W.D. Mo. May 28, 2010).  In the agreement, Columbia agreed to "indemnify, defend and save harmless Marriott against all losses, damages, claims, . . . arising out of . . . the Franchised