A commentary on insurance coverage issues in Hawaii and beyond
The federal district court in Hawaii determined a subcontractor had no coverage under his homeowner's and umbrella policies for claims based on faulty workmanship. State Farm Fire & Cas. Co. v. Kaaihue, 2013 U.S. Dist. LEXIS 175395 (D. Haw. Dec. 13, 2013).
Allstate Insurance Personal Lines pursued a subrogation claim in state…
The trial court's holding that there was no occurrence based on claims from faulty workmanship was reversed by the appellate division of the Pennsylvania Superior Court. The underlying claims were based on product liability tort claims, not faulty workmanship. Indalex Inc. v. National Union Fire Insurance Co. of Pittsburgh, PA., 2013 Pa. Super.
Following Kentucky law, the Sixth Circuit determined there was no coverage for a construction defect claim. Liberty Mut. Fire Ins. Co. v. Kay & Kay Contracting, LLC, 2013 U.S. App. LEXIS 23587 (6th Cir. Nov. 19, 2013).
Walmart hired a contractor to build a new store. The contractor hired Kay and Kay…
The federal district court for Northern California granted the insurer's motion for reimbursement of funds advanced to the insured under a reservation of rights. Great Am. Ins. Co. v. Chang, 2013 U.S. Dist. LEXIS 159197 (N.D. Cal. Nov. 6, 2013).
The Changs operated a dry cleaner business on their property from 1977…
The California Court of Appeal ruled that an insurer does not have a duty to defend a lawsuit seeking injunctive relief and no compensatory damages. San Miguel Cmty. Assn. v. State Farm Gen. Ins. Co., 2013 Cal. App. LEXIS 836 (Cal. Ct. App. Oct. 1, 2013).
San Miguel was a nonprofit residential…
The court determined there were sufficient allegations in the underlying complaint and third party complaints to raise a duty to defend for the additional insured. Ill. Emcasco Ins. Co. v. Waukegan Steel Sales, 2013 Ill. App. LEXIS 624 (Ill. Ct. App. Sept. 13, 2013).
Waukegan was named as an additional insured under subcontractor…
The Akamai Money section of yesterday's Honolulu Star-Advertiser published my short article on insurance coverage basics. The article is here.
The Ninth Circuit held there is a duty to defend not only a PRP letter issued by the EPA, but also a section 104 (e) letter. Anderson Brothers, Inc. v. St. Paul Fire and Marine Ins. Co., 2013 U.S. App. LEXIS 18156 (9th Cir. Aug. 30, 2013).
The insured received two letters…
The Third Circuit affirmed the District Court's finding that the insurers had no duty to defend day care and youth centers for bribes and kickbacks allegedly paid to two state court judges. Markel Int'l Ins. Co. v. W. Childcare, LLC, 2013 U.S. App. LEXIS 14017 (3d Cir. July 8, 2013).
In 2009…
In an significant decision touching on a host of issues, the Hawaii Intermediate Court of Appeals (ICA) overturned the circuit court and found numerous insurers had a duty to defend its insured for bodily injury and property damage caused by the 2006 breach of the Kaloko Dam on Kauai. C. Brewer and Co., Ltd. …
