Faced with a motion for judgment on the pleadings filed by several of its insurers, the insured was successful in arguing that the Loss of Attraction endorsement in one insurer's policy allowed the insured to pursue losses suffered by its businesses due to COVID-19. BBX Capital Corp. v. Scottsdale Ins. Co., et

    In answering a certified question from the Ninth Circuit, the Alaska Supreme Court determined that an insured could reasonably expect coverage for injuries resulting form exposure to carbon monoxide from an improperly installed home applicance.

    Josiah Wheeler rented a cabin owned by Deborah Overly and Terry Summers. While living in the

    The homeowner's complaint was improperly dismissed without leave to amend to demonstrate she was a third-party beneficiary of a lender-placed policy on her home. Williams v. Integon Nat'l Ins. Co., 2025 U.S. App LEXIS 6919 (5th Cir. March 25, 2025).

    Ellen Williams purchased a home which was mortgaged by Flagstar

    The court granted the insurer's motion for summary judgment when the insured failed to raise a genuine issue of material fact as to whether he insurer acted in bad faith. Dillen v. QBE Ins. Corp. 2025 U.S. Dist. LEXIS 24742 (S.D. Texas Feb. 11, 2025).

    The insureds were away from

    We presented at the ABA’s  Insurance Coverage Litigation Committee’s annual seminar in Tucson yesterday. We delved into “The Ins and Outs of Outside Adjusters.”  Thanks to my co-presenters, Karin S. Aldama, Esq., from Gallagher Kennedy and Rina Carmel, Esq., from Anderson, McPharlin & Conners LLP. 

ICLC Seminar 2025 - Tucson