Bound by Pennsylvania law, the federal district court found there was no coverage for defects in the installation of a roof. State Farm Fire & Cas. Co. v. Kim's Asia Constr., 2016 U.S. Dist. LEXIS 138915 (E.D. Pa. Oct. 5, 2016).

    Kim's Asia Construction contracted to remove and dispose of

    The Illinois Appellate Court determined the general contractor was not covered for construction defects despite allegations of damage to personal property. Wesfield Ins. Co. v. West Van Buren, LLC, 59 N.E. 2d 877, (Ill. Ct. App. 2016). 

    The developer constructed a condominium development in Chicago. The installation of the roof was

    Interpreting Florida law, the United States District Court found there was no duty to defend a contractor against construction defect claims. Evanston Ins. Co. v. Dimmucci Dev. Corp. of Ponce Inlet, Inc., 2016 U.S. Dist. LEXIS 123678 (M.D. Fla. Sept 13, 2016).

    The insured built condominiums and townhomes. It held three successive CGL policies

    In a sensitive opinion incorporating several redactions, apparently due to national security issues, the court found that the business risk exclusions raised by the insurer did not apply in determining whether there was a duty to defend. Innovative Mold Solutions v. All Am. Ins. Co., 2016 U.S. Dist. LEXIS 91671 (D. Mass. July 12, 2016).

    Distinguishing its seminal case on coverage for construction defects, Weedo v. Stone-E-Brick, Inc., 81 N.J. 233 (1979), the New Jersey Supreme Court determined that rain damage to the building caused by a subcontractor's faulty workmanship constituted "property damage" and an "occurrence" under the property developer's CGL policy. Cypress Point Condo. Ass'n v.Towers

   The Fifth Circuit found that two storms causing damage to a drilling rig constituted two occurrences, mandating payment of two deductibles. Seahawk Liquidating Trust v. Certain Underwriters at Lloyds London, 2016 U.S. App. LEXIS 871 (5th Cir. Jan 19,2016).

   Seahawk's rig was three-legged, and rose from the seabed by jacking up of 375 foot-legs.

   The district court determined there was a duty to defend based upon allegations that the insured's pillows and mattresses emitted an odor causing bodily injury and property damage to the underlying plaintiffs. Hartford Fire Ins. Co. v. Tempur-Sealy Int'l, Inc., 2016 U.S.Dist. LEXIS 6706 (N.D. Cal. Jan. 20, 2016).

   The insured faced a