Occurrence

Subscribe to Occurrence via RSS

    The court determined there was no coverage for 150 underlying lawsuits which alleged that injections for back pain caused bodily injury and death. Westfield Ins. Co. v. Orthopedic & Sports Med. Ctr. of N. Ind., 2017 U.S. Dist. LEXIS 46119 (N. Ind. March 28, 2017).

    NECC made preservative-free methylprednisolone acetate (MPA). MPA was an epidural…

    Following Pennsylvania law, the Fourth Circuit found one occurrence in a fireworks accident despite allegations of 19 breaches of duty. Hollis v. Lexington Ins. Co., 2017 U.S. App LEXIS 5088 (4th Cir. March 22, 2017).

    Kathryn Hollis and her two sons received injuries from a fireworks explosion. The underlying action alleged that the fireworks company…

    The New Jersey Supreme Court found that an anti-assignment provision could not be applied to bar a post-loss claim assignment. Givaudan Fragrances Corp. v. Aetna Cas. & Sur. Co., 2017 N.J. LEXIS 121 (N.J. Feb. 1, 2017). In reaching its decision, the court distinguished a decision from the Hawaii Supreme Court enforcing consent-to-assignment clauses and failing…

    The Ohio Court of Appeals determined that the CGL policy was ambiguous as to whether a subcontractor's faulty workmanship was an "occurrence." Ohio N. Univ. v. Charles Constr. Serv., 2017 Ohio App. LEXIS 258 (Ohio Ct. App. Jan. 23, 2017).

    In 2007, Ohio Northern University (ONU) entered a contract with Charles Construction Services, Inc.

    Applying Montana law, the federal district court found there was no coverage for a subcontractor who was sued by the contractor for breach of the subcontract. Phoenix Ins. Co. v. Ed Boland Constr., Inc., 2017 U.S. Dist. LEXIS 6654 (D. Mont. Jan 18, 2017).

    Northbank was the general contractor on a project to repair a bridge…

    Applying Iowa law, the federal district court found that the insurer had to defend and indemnify construction defect claims for damage to property caused by the insured's subcontractors. Van Der Weide v. Cincinnati Ins., 2017 U.S. Dist. LEXIS 4469 (N.D. Iowa Jan. 12, 2017).

    Van Der Weide contracted with Bouma…

    The additional insured unsuccessfully sought to recover damages to its building caused by the named insured. Brit UW, Ltd. v. Tripar, Inc., 2017 U.S. Dist. LEXIS 2462 (N.D. Ill. Jan. 6, 2017).

    Davis Russell Real Estate and Management LLC hired Tripar, Inc., a general contractor, to renovate a 12-unit apartment building. The entire roof was…

    The California Court of Appeal determined there was no duty to indemnify and the insured had to reimburse the insurer's contribution to a settlement. Nevertheless, there was a duty to defend, meaning the insured did not have to reimburse amounts it was entitled to under the supplemental payments provision. Navigators Specialty Ins. Co. v. …

    The California Court of Appeal overturned the trial court's issuance of summary judgment based upon the possibility of continuing property damage during the insurer's policy period. Tidwell Enters. v. Fin. Pac. Ins. Co., 2016 Cal. App. LEXIS 1038 (Cal. Ct. App. Nov. 29, 2016).

    Financial Pacific insured Greg Tidwell, Tidwell Enterprises, Inc. and Tidwell…