A commentary on insurance coverage issues in Hawaii and beyond
The Eleventh Circuit affirmed the district court's determination that the two insurers' "other insurance" provisions were irreconcilable and instructed the insurers to provide coverage on a pro rata basis. Nat'l Cas. Co. v. Gerogia School Board Associaiotn – Risk Managment Fund, 2023 U.S. App. LEXIS 24426 (11th Cir. Sept. 14, 2023).
…
The magistrate judge recommended that the insurer's motion for judgment on the pleadings be denied in a case involving coverage for the insured subcontractor's alleged faulty workmanship. Evanston Ins. Co. v. Sonny Glasbrenner, Inc., 2023 U.S. Dist. LEXIS 190019 (M.D. Fla. Oct. 20, 2023).
Cone & Graham (C&G), the general…
The magistrate judge recommended a determination that the insurer owed a defense to the subcontractor sued for faulty workmanship. Hanover Lloyds Ins Co. v. Donegal Mut. Ins. Co., 2023 U.S. Dist. LEXIS 180877 (W.D. Texas Oct. 5, 2023).
Poe Investments, Ltd. entered into an agreement with Jordan Foster Construction, LLC…
The Eleventh Circuit recently held that the district court's order compelling appraisal and staying the proceedings pending appraisal was an interlocutory order that was not immediately appealable under 28 U.S.C. 1292 (a) (1). Positano Place at Naples Condominium Association, Inc. v. Empire Indem. Ins. Co., 2023 U.S. App. LEXIS 27961 (11th Cir.
In a coverage dispute between two insurers over a claim for damages caused by faulty workmanship, the court found there was no right to equitable contribution or indemnity. Travelers Prop. Cas. Co. of Am. v. Mallcraft, Inc., 2023 Cal. Super. LEXIS 67568 (Cal. Super. Ct. Sept. 15, 2023).
Mallcraft was…
The court granted the insurer's motion for summary judgment finding damage to the gym floor due to a poor paint job was not a resulting loss. Bob Robinson Commercial Flooring, Inc. v. RLI Ins,. Co., 2023 U.S. Dist. LEXIS 196105 (D. Ark. Nov. 1, 2023).
Bob Robinson Commercial Flooring (BRCF)…
The insured's claim failed to fall within coverage under the cyber policy. Ford L.L.C. v. Lexington Ins. Co., 2023 U.S Dist. LEXIS 177426 (W.D. La. Oct. 2. 2023).
The insured, Benoit Ford, LLC and Benoit Nissan, LLC, sought coverage under their cyber policy after the theft of vehicles. Benoit owned…
Facing an issue of first impression in Hawaii, the Supreme Court held that insurers have no right to reimbursement of defense costs unless the policy specifically provides for reimbursement. St. Paul Fire and Marine Ins. Co., et al. v. Bodell Construction Co., et al., 2023 Haw. LEXIS 194 (Haw. Nov. 14, 2023).
The trial court's dismissal of the insured's loss of business income claim due to COVID-19 based upon a traditional pollution exclusions was reversed and remanded as to most of the insurers. JRK Prop. Holdings v. Colony Ins. Co., 2023 Cal. App. LEXIS 760 (Cal. Ct. App. Oct. 2, 2023).
JRK…
The Court held that the insurer defending the additional insured general contractor had no right to equitable subrogation or equitable contribution from a separate carrier who also insured the general contractor as an additional insured. Old Republic Gen. Ins. Co. v. Amerisure Ins. Co., 2023 U.S. Dist. LEXIS 170293 (N.D. Ill. Sept.
