A commentary on insurance coverage issues in Hawaii and beyond
Applying Missouri law, the Eighth Circuit affirmed the jury verdict awarding damages for the presence of soot after a fire. Maxus Metropolitan, LLC v. Travelers Property Cas. Co. of Am., 2025 U.S. App. LEXIS 29921 (8th Cir. Nov, 17, 2025).
A fire destroyed Phase 6 of a multi-building apartment complex known as the Metropolitan.
The Fifth Circuit affirmed the district court's grant of summary judgment to the insurer despite the insured's claim it was not adequately compensated for its loss. In the Matter of New York Inn, Inc., 2025 U.S. App. LEXIS 7887 (5th Cir. April 3, 2025).
Viva Inn Motel submitted a claim…
Faced with a motion for judgment on the pleadings filed by several of its insurers, the insured was successful in arguing that the Loss of Attraction endorsement in one insurer's policy allowed the insured to pursue losses suffered by its businesses due to COVID-19. BBX Capital Corp. v. Scottsdale Ins. Co., et …
Departing from the multitude of decisions that have determined there is no coverage for losses due to the COVID-19 pandemic, the North Carolina Supreme Court found that various bars and restaurants that were closed during the pandemic under government orders stated a claim for coverage when suing their insurers. North State Deli, LLC, …
The insurers' motion to dismiss a COVID-19 claim was denied based upon an endorsement for business interruption claims. Mandarin Oriental, Inc. v. HDI Global Ins. Co., 2024 U.S. Dist. LEXIS 169836 (S.D N.Y. Sept. 19, 2024).
Mandarin owned hotels in, among other cities, Miami, New York, Washington, D.C. and Boston.
The federal district court entered judgment based on the appraisal panel's award over the insurer's objections. Proto Gage, Inc. v. Federal Ins. Co., Inc., 2024 U.S. Dist. LEXIS 155699 (E.D. Mich. Aug. 29, 2024).
Proto Gage sought coverage from Federal for its business income losses resulting from the failure of…
The court was asked to determine the correct methodology for calculating Business Income Loss under the Smart Cyber Insurance Policy after the insured suffered from a cyber attack. Heritage Co., Inc. v. Hudson Excess Ins. Co., 2024 U.S. Dist. LEXIS 91714 (E.D. Ark. May 22, 2024).
Heritage suffered from a…
The Court of Appeal reversed the trial court's granting of a motion for judgment on the pleadings, dismissing the insured's claim for loss due to the presence of COVID-19. Brooklyn Restaurants, Inc. v. Sentinel Ins. Co., Ltd., 2024 Cal. App. Unpub. LEXIS 1754 (Cal Ct. App. March 20, 2024).
Brooklyn…
The trial court's dismissal of the insured's loss of business income claim due to COVID-19 based upon a traditional pollution exclusions was reversed and remanded as to most of the insurers. JRK Prop. Holdings v. Colony Ins. Co., 2023 Cal. App. LEXIS 760 (Cal. Ct. App. Oct. 2, 2023).
JRK…
The Ninth Circuit asked the California Supreme Court to address whether the policy's virus exclusion was enforceable to preclude coverage for business income losses due to the present of COVID-19 at the insured's properties. French Laundry Partners LP v. Hartford Fire Ins. Co., 2023 U.S. App. LEXIS 2845 (9th Cir. Feb. 6…
