The Texas Supreme Court determined that language in the following form excess policy did not obligate it to defend the insured. Ohio Cas. Ins. Co. v Patterson UTI Energy, Inc., 2025 Tex. LEXIS 1123 (Tex. Sup. Ct. Dec. 20, 2024).
Patterson provided oil-and-gas equipment and services. Patterson was insured by
We presented at the ABA’s Insurance Coverage Litigation Committee’s annual seminar in Tucson yesterday. We delved into “The Ins and Outs of Outside Adjusters.” Thanks to my co-presenters, Karin S. Aldama, Esq., from Gallagher Kennedy and Rina Carmel, Esq., from Anderson, McPharlin & Conners LLP.
On the heals of a decision from a federal district court that smoke damaged was a direct physical loss, the California Court of Appeal affirmed the trial court's grant of summary judgment to the insurer regarding the insureds' claim for loss due to smoke damage. Gharibian v. Wawanesa General Ins. Co., 2025
Headed to Tucson this week to attend the ABA's annual Insurance Coverage Litigation Committee seminar. Always great presentations and discussions on a variety of coverage topics. Along with my co-panelists, Rina Carmel and Karin S. Aldama, we will lead a discussion on The Ins and Outs of Outside Adjusters. Looking forward to it
The federal district court found that smoke and soot contamination rendered the property unfit for normal use, meeting the standard for "direct physical loss" under the policy language for recovery of business income. Bottega, LLC, et al. v. National Surety Corporation-Chicago, Il, 2025 U.S. Dist. LEXIS 5666 (N.D. Cal. Jan. 10, 2025).
Bottega
The insured's claim for collapse of a building was denied after failing to file suit within the two-year limitation set forth in the policy. 94 Broad Street, LLC v. The Hartford Financial Services Group, Inc., 2025 Conn. Super. LEXIS 112 (Conn. Super. Ct. Jan. 24, 2025).
The insured had a
The court denied the insurer's Motion for Summary Judgment seeking to dismiss the insured's breach of contract claim. The court also denied the insurer's Daubert motion to exclude the insured's expert witness. Ram Krishana Inc. v. Mt. Hawley Ins Co., 2025 U.S. Dist. LEXIS 18912 (S.D N.Y Feb. 3, 2025).
The court denied the insurer's motion to compel an inspection of the insured's residential rental property and the insurer's request for attorney fees. Bradley v. Evanston Ins. Co., 2025 U.S. Dist. LEXIS 14522 (E.D. La. Jan. 27, 2025).
Plaintiff suffered damage to her property due to Hurricane Ida. Evanston insured
The settlement reached in the Maui fire cases appears to be a step closer to becoming a reality after the Hawaii Supreme Court issued its Order answering three reserved questions posed by the circuit court. In the Matter of the Petition for the Coordination of Maui Fire Cases, SCRQ-24-0000602 (Order Feb. 10, 2025). The Order
The federal district court granted the insurer's motion for summary judgment because the insureds failed to meet their burden of establishing the claim was covered by the policy. Cutchall v. Chubb Lloyd's Ins. Co. of Tex., 2024 U.S. Dist. LEXIS 234546 (S. D. Texas Dec. 31, 2024).
In September 2021
