The federal district court rejected the insured's argument and held that the policy's Limit of Liability section placed an annual cap on the aggregate limits available under the policy. Evanston Ins. Co. v. Roman Catholic Bishop of Orange, 2024 U.S. Dist. LEXIS 229122 (C.D. Cal. Dec. 17, 2024).

    John OC-5

    The Seventh Circuit reversed the district court's finding that the insured architecture firm was not entitled to a defense. Cornice & Rose International, LLC v. Acuity, 2024 U.S. App. LEXIS 29925 (7th Cir. Nov. 25, 2024).

    Cornice, an architectural firm, oversaw the construction of a building in Iowa. Under the

    The court reversed dismissal of all claims against the insurers for a work-related death after determining that policy exclusions conflicted with statutory mandates on coverage. Waiau, et al. v. Hawaii Employers' Mut. Ins. Co,  Inc., et al., 2024 Haw. App, LEXIS 583 (Haw. Ct. App., Dec. 31, 2014).

    Amos K.

    The First Circuit, following Massachusetts law, found that coverage for allegations against the insured contractor for faulty workmanship were barred by the policy's (j) (6) Exclusion. Admiral Ins. Co. v. Tocci Bldg. Corp., 2024 U.S. App. LEXIS 28439 (1st Cir. Nov. 8, 2024). 

    Tocci Building Corporation was the construction manager